The question of omnipotence is posed as a paradox, which asks, sens God create a fossa so heavy that he cannot lift it? If he can create such a stone, then there is something that God cannot do, lift the stone, therefore God is not omnipotent and cannot exist. If he cannot create such a stone, then there is another(prenominal) thing that God cannot do, these he is not omnipotent, and cannot exist.
There ar many arguments for the existence of God. The cosmological argument argues that there was a first cause, or prime mover who is set as God, the teleological argument argues that the universes order and complexity are trump out explained by reference to a creator God, and the he ontological argument is based on arguments about a being greater than which cannot be conceived.
Another argument is the lesson argument. This states that humans beings are aware of actions as being sound and wrong, obligatory and forbidden.
Such awareness carries with it the thought that they are adjoin to do some things and bound to avoid doing others. This is called moral normativity and is best explained through moral fairnesss. Since a law cannot be effectual unless there is intelligence activity which recognizes and upholds it and it cannot be human intelligence that provides the involve recognition and upholding of moral law since the moral law holds everyplace whereas the human mind is limited in its comprehension and scope. The attach promulgator must have authority over all human beings at all times and places. Thus the only intelligence and will that can be the source of the moral law is that found in God. The argument would be:...If you want to ram a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment