By Dick Hardt
In the relatively short tale of the Internet, there have been numerous attempts to
solve the internet identity problem. HTTP Au pasttication (RFC 2617), PKI, PGP,
Passport, Liberty, XRI, CardSpace and OpeniD have all failed to be loosely take.
Proprietary identity services from Twitter and Facebook have more(prenominal) deployment,
even though identity is not the focus of those services.
Reviewing the precedent attempts at solving internet identity, some characteristics of
a winning system emerge:
An internet identity system has a number of players: exploiters, replying parties and
identity providers. All of these parties need to see look on in a dissolvent. If there is only
a chicken and an egg, then it looks like progress, but without a rooster, nothing more
will happen.
The solution needs to be unreserved to deploy by users, relying parties and identity
providers with a simple migration path from existing systems. Relying parties and
users need a simple process for account linking.
There are many platforms direct on the internet. Existing browsers, mobile browsing,
mobile apps, desktop apps, internet connected devices.
A solution needs to name
across intimately if not all of them.
Different applications have different security department and risk indites. A broadly adopted
solution will descale across a broad spectrum of security requirements.
A user experience that is easy for users to understand and is relatively transparent
that can work across all platforms: plain browser, enhanced browser, and mobile.
Identity is more than authentication. The success of Facebook et al is driven by
access to information near the user rather than just which user it is. A broadly
adopted solution will enable the user to share profile information and delegate
authorization.If you want to get a full essay, locate it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment