The civil war in england had caused serious conclusions as to the inhering course of english history. Up till then, monarchy had managed to establish a thorough dominance over the english public. England had adopted a organization of ruling based upon authority of one convention granted with absolute power. As we see in Grecian culture especially in platos naturalize republic the brain of a state with only one ruler was favored. They called the system body politics which was also accepted by the European society. The head was the ruler and the remaining parts were the citizens who had to be rule. The estimate of the divine rights of the mogul was put to emphasise the idea that the king is sovereing and to be obeyed in teeming submission. ?n the years star(p) up to 1640s certain disappointment was wittnessed amongst some religous sects with the authority of the king. particularly the puritans who were already complaining about incompleteness of the reformation were the ones who were around displeased with idea of a king. Charles I. began drawing the reaction of the puritans when he dissolved the parliament. The kings mistake was his wasting the money of the state for his own personal desires. We already know that a contentious mesh of the ideas had already began between royalists and puritans.
Milton was the important figure in this conflict with the king. To summarise his personal opinion on how england shoul be ruled we can say that he supported the destruction of the ground and the establishment of a parlaiment. He favored the idea of a commonwealth state where a free parliament would work to give people a good and virtous life. As he saw the king as satanic figure who was exploiting peoples craunch to make his life comfortable,
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment