'‘Joseph Stalin’s Foreign Policy During and After the Second World War Was an Unmitigated Failure.’ Do You Agree with This Statement?\r'

' apparent motion 1: ‘Joseph Stalins impertinent indemnity during and aft(prenominal)wards the Second human race War was an rigorous failure. ‘ Do you agree with this statement? Joseph Stalin, the frequent Secretary of the USSR, who had sign(a) devil concords during and after the Second military man War. The two agreements were signed under Yalta convocation and Potsdam Conference in February 1945 and 17 July †2 August 1945 respectively. These two agreements were both influenced USSR future. In the following essay, it proves whether Joseph Stalins international policy during and after the Second realness War was an double-dyed(prenominal) failure.First of all, the definition of ‘foreign policy is the interaction between countries that they are expiration to achieve something and both have usefulness with it. On the other hand, according to the Oxford pass on Learners English-Chinese Dictionary, the terms, ‘unmitigated and ‘failu re mean ‘”complete”, usually when describing something rubber and ‘ non successful, lack of success in doing or achieving something respectively. In my opinion, I would define ‘unmitigated failure as no achievement and all told fail to obtain the goal, as nearly as making a bad moorage to itself.At the end of the Second World War (February 1945), there was a Yalta Conference held in the Crimea. The purpose of this Conference was discussing Germanys post-war reorganization. The enlarged Three were attended, including Winston Churchill, Franklin Roosevelt and Joseph Stalin. The agreement was signed to break open Germany into zone, under control by get together farming, USSR and British, and later France, as well as her capital, Berlin. Notwithstanding, Berlin was internal the control region of USSR; this situation implicated the potential crisis later.As Berlin located inside Eastern Germany, where under USSR’s control, it allowed the US, Britain and Frances to submit the USSR’s control area. It implies that, although the USSR had pass around its big businessman to the Eastern Germany, it did not mean that USSR would have a total authority of it. Therefore, it could find as one of the failure of Joseph Stalin’s foreign policy. In addition, the free preference holds in the Baltic States, Poland, and elsewhere in Eastern Europe Since the agreement diss ever the Eastern part of Germany to USSR, the power of USSR spread to the Eastern Europe.However, Stalin was not satisfied with it, â€Å"Stalins postwar goals were security for himself, his regime, his country, and his ideology, in precisely that order. ” (John 1972 p. 11) We drive out notice that Stalins was a actually raptorial person, never stopped achieving the greater goal. Although he had already occupied the Eastern Germany, that is not enough for him. He would rather do more to protect and expand USSR, preferably of being satisfied . â€Å"No internal challenges could ever once more endanger his personal ascertain… o external threats would ever again place his country at luck… the international communist movement, enormously feared — only if similarly wide worshipped” (John 1972 p. 11) Moreover, Stalin was very careful about the internal challenges and external threats. Apart from deciding to eliminate the dangers and territories towards his country, Stalins communism was also feared by other, and being widely worshipped. Nonetheless, USSR was not totally benefited on it; the agreement caused USSR fell into dilemma later.As the United State and British were pursued capitalism, it could be a worse situation to USSR. This extreme lineage between countries gave rise to their bad stead toward one some other. According to Lenin, â€Å"The most essential one was the belief, which went back to Lenin, that capitalists would never be able to cooperate with one another for very longâ₠¬Â (John 1972 p. 12) Lenin belief is true, since after the Second World War, USSR and US no longer had common enemy, the tension and misgiving between these two countries was deteriorated.After the Second World War, the Potsdam Conference held in Potsdam, Germany. This conference also attended by the big three, the saucily US president, Harry Truman did not affirm Stalin that US had made and successfully tried and true the atomic bombs which regarded as powerful sassy weapon at that time. It lends to the tension and conflicts arose. The frisky relationship between USSR and USA break out in this conference. Although the foreign policy of Joseph Stalin caused USSR to fall into difficulty, there were some achievements.Obviously, no policy could be defined as unmitigated failure, every policy at least have its own achievement. Therefore, I disagree with this statement. Reference: · John Lewis Gaddis, The snappy War, p. 11,12 · Stalins Mistake, http://www. fsmitha. com/mist akes/victory-stalin. htm surf on 30/10/2012 · Yalta Conference foreshadows the Cold War, http://www. history. com/this-day-in-history/yalta-conference-foreshadows-the-cold-war surf on 30/10/2012\r\n'